Platypus Genome Fun

Posted: May 8, 2008 in Australia, Evolution, News, Technology
Tags: , ,

Often the case of the Platypus is an example brought up by Creationists as a case of something the Theory of Evolution is unable to explain.  Of course, they were wrong then and it seems that some further research has shown them to be even more wrong (if that is possible).  The following is the same story from two different sources as they tend to focus on slightly different things.

All mixed up: Platypus genome decoded

Scientists have for the first time unveiled the unusual genetic make-up of the Australian platypus.

According to the study released this morning in the journal Nature, the semi-aquatic animal is a genetic potpourri – part bird, part reptile and part lactating mammal.

The task of laying bare the platypus genome of 2.2 billion base pairs spread across 18,500 genes has taken several years, but will do far more than satisfy the curiosity of just biologists, say the researchers.

“The platypus genome is extremely important, because it is the missing link in our understanding of how we and other mammals first evolved,” explained Oxford University’s Chris Ponting, one of the study’s architects.

“This is our ticket back in time to when all mammals laid eggs while suckling their young on milk.”

Native to eastern mainland Australia and Tasmania, the semi-aquatic platypus is thought to have split off from a common ancestor shared with humans approximately 170 million years ago.

The creature is so strange that when the first stuffed specimens arrived in Europe at the end of the 18th century, biologists believed they were looking at a taxidermist’s hoax, a composite stitched together from the body of a beaver and the snout of a giant duck.

But the peculiar mix of body features are clearly reflected in the animal’s DNA, the study found.

The platypus is classified as a mammal because it produces milk and is covered in coat of thick fur, once prized by hunters.

Lacking teats, the female nurses pups through the skin covering its abdomen.

There are reptile-like attributes too; females lay eggs, and males can stab aggressors with a snake-like venom that flows from a spur tucked under its hind feet.

The bird-like qualities implied by its Latin name, Ornithorhynchus anatinus, include webbed feet, a flat bill similar to a duck’s, and the gene sequences that determine sex. Whereas humans have two sex chromosomes, platypuses have 10, the study showed.

“It is much more of a melange than anyone expected,” said Ewan Birney, who led the genome analysis at the European Bioinformatics Institute in Cambridge.

The animal also possesses a feature unique to monotremes, an order including a handful of egg-laying mammals, called electroreception.

With their eyes, ears and nostrils closed, platypuses rely on sensitive electrosensory receptors tucked inside their bills to track prey underwater, detecting electrical fields generated by muscular contraction.

“By comparing the platypus genome to other mammalian genomes, we’ll be able to study genes that have been conserved throughout evolution,” said senior author Richard Wilson, a researcher at Washington University.

In captivity, platypuses have lived up to 17 years of age.

In the wild, they feed on worms, insect larvae, shrimps and crayfish, eating up to 20 per cent of their body weight everyday.

Males grow to a length of 50 centimetres (20 inches) and weigh about two kilos, with females about 20 per cent shorter and lighter.

The genome sequenced for the study belongs to a female specimen from New South Wales nicknamed Glennie and can be accessed at

Jenny Graves from the Australian National University says by mapping the genome, the scientists also found the platypus has an unusual genetic sexual make up.

“In fact the platypus does sex like a bird, we know that other mammals have an X and a Y chromosome and there’s a gene on the Y chromosome that makes you male, that’s SRY and we found there is no SRY in a platypus,” she said.

“In fact, the platypus sex chromosome is derived not from other mammal sex chromosomes but from bird sex chromosomes.”

The genome mapping also revealed the platypus venom produces some useful chemical compounds which may eventually help develop human medicines such as painkillers and potent antibiotics.

Duck-billed platypus is dismissed by Oxford scientists as daffy

When the first duck-billed platypus specimens were sent from Australia to Europe at the end of the 18th century, the bizarre combination of mammal, bird and reptile features led many zoologists to consider them a hoax.

The reason for that first impression has now been revealed: the first analysis of its DNA code has shown that at a genetic level the platypus is indeed a unique amalgam of mammal, reptile and bird.

The platypus genome, sequenced from a female named Glennie, has allowed scientists to examine how evolution shaped not only the strange egg-laying mammal, but also relatives such as human beings. It may even offer insights into human diseases, by revealing genes that are critical to the mammalian immune system.

“This is our ticket back in time, to when all mammals laid eggs while suckling their young on milk,” said Chris Ponting, of the University of Oxford, one of the leaders of the international research team.

Francis Collins, director of the US National Human Genome Research Institute, said: “At first glance, the platypus appears as if it was the result of an evolutionary accident. But as weird as this animal looks, its genome sequence is priceless for understanding how fundamental mammalian biological processes have evolved.

“Comparisons of the platypus genome to those of other mammals will provide new insights into the history, structure and function of our own genome.”

The platypus code has already been compared with those of people, mice, dogs, opossums and chickens, as well as the draft sequence of the green anole lizard to examine its similarity to reptiles. This has shown that although it diverged from other mammals about 166 million years ago it still shares about 82 per cent of its genes with very different relatives, such as people and mice.

Other aspects of its genome, however, appear distinctly avian or reptilian in character. Ewan Birney, of the European Bioinformatics Institute, who led the genome analysis, said: “The platypus looks like a strange blend of mammalian, bird-like and reptilian features and now we know that the genome is an equally bizarre mix of all of these. It is much more of a melange than anyone expected.”

The male platypus is unique among mammals in having venomous spurs on its hind legs, with which it injects rivals and predators with painful poison. The genes that produce this venom are very similar to those found in snakes. Other reptilian characteristics include genes that support egg-laying.

The animal’s sex chromosomes have similarities with those of birds. It has ten sex chromosomes, where most mammals, including humans, have only two.

Mammalian characteristics include an unexpectedly high number of genes involved in detecting scent, which is surprising because the creature spends most of its time under water with its nostrils closed.

The genetic code of the platypus, which has the Latin name Ornithorhynchus anatinus, meaning “duck-like bird-snout”, should shed light on its ability to detect prey under water using an electro-sensory organ in its bill.

The sequence, which is published in the journal Nature, shows that the platypus genome contains approximately 2.2 billion DNA letters, and about 18,500 genes. This compares with 3 billion letters and an estimated 21,500 genes in the human genome. Comparisons between the two genomes should help scientists to understand the function of genes that are critical to human health.

Mark Batzer, of Louisiana State University, said: “This is a huge genetic step. We’re learning a lot about mammalian gene regulation and immune systems, which has huge implications for disease susceptibility research.”

The platypus is a monotreme, from a group of mammals that diverged from the marsupials and placental mammals about 166 million years ago.

Nature trick

— Platypus comes from the Greek for “flat foot”, reflecting its webbed feet

— The animal is native to Australia and was first described by Europeans in 1798

— When a pelt and drawing were sent to England by the Governor of New South Wales, the zoologist George Shaw was so doubtful it was real that he cut it open to look for stitches

— It is an egg-laying mammal known as a monotreme, one of only five species in the order

— On its hind legs the male has a spur that produces venom, a unique feature among mammals

  1. S Keita says:

    Can you do the math, Matt? – I can’t!

    There are 750 trillion connections in the brain. The 1st brain emerged 600 mya. How many connections is that per year?

    Looking forward to your reply.

  2. Matt says:

    I’m forced to wonder what your point, if any, is with your comment. You best elaborate.

    At this point I have to assume you’re going to proceed along the lines of “I can’t see/believe how such a complicated arrangement could have formed via evolution” which is is worthless as any sort of argument. As PZ Myers stated to Simmons of the Discovery Institute recently ‘your ignorance is not evidence’.

    That, of course, is just an assumption since I have some vague memory of you going about other blogs and asking the same blatantly silly thing. You really do need to express yourself better.

  3. S Keita says:

    Thanks for your prompt reply.

    I expected you to claim to be unable to understand a simple question. It’s not possible to defend evolution without shouting abuse. The answer would appear to be that a trillion is a million million. So the answer appears to be roughly a million a year.

    You don’t find that a lot? You don’t have any curiosity to know how that happened? Fine. Like Prof. Dawkins, you obviously lack scientific curiosity.

  4. Matt says:

    Oh, what a fallacious little argument you badly attempt to make. You asked a question based on maths but actually was a badly disguised attack on the Theory of Evolution, an attack based on nothing more than your own ignorance.

    The point of your question was, and really still is, unclear even if the question itself is rather simple. Upon two requests to elaborate on why you asked that question … well, you have still failed to do so.

    Shouting abuse? Hm, interesting. I don’t see anywhere here that I have abused anyone much less shouted. I have made an assumption based on what I recall of your posting history, no more.

    You have yet failed to make any sort of argument, provided any evidence or anything that might possibly be countered as constructive to any sort of conversation or debate. If you wish to make some sort of point, I suggest you do so.

  5. KL says:

    S Keita you have convinced me now. One million brain connections per year! If that doesn’t prove the existence of an omnipotent creator I don’t know what will.

    Answer me this question. If God designed the human brain why did he bother with all the less complex versions present in other organisms?

    The same question can be applied to the human eye, ear, nose and throat.

  6. tinyfrog says:

    There are 750 trillion connections in the brain. The 1st brain emerged 600 mya. How many connections is that per year?.. roughly a million a year … You don’t have any curiosity to know how that happened?

    I’m still trying to figure out what point S Keita was attempting to make. I think he/she is trying to say that genes must code each and every neural connection – and because there aren’t a million gene mutations a year over the past 600 million years, that the increase in neural connections is inexplicable. Of course, that’s not how neural connections are formed, and that’s not how genes work. The whole point seems to depend on a bad understanding of biology.

  7. ozatheist says:

    platypus venom produces some useful chemical compounds which may eventually help develop human medicines such as painkillers and potent antibiotics.

    one of the media reports stated that the venom is also given to the offspring to boost their immune system – sounded interesting but I have no data to back that up

    The platypus is a weird and wonderful creature.

    S. Keita is just weird.

  8. BenYachov(Jim Scott 4th) says:

    >Of course, that’s not how neural connections are formed, and that’s not how genes work. The whole point seems to depend on a bad understanding of biology.

    I reply: How do it work then?

  9. tinyfrog says:

    > How do it work then?

    S Keita starts off talking about connections in the brain. Neural connections are connections between neural cells. They are formed and decay with learning. You can think of connections as tree branches – the nature of neural cells is to branch out and form connections. The neurons do have some general pattern to them – but more in terms of “grow this direction”, “grow X millimeters long”. You can think of the different types of neurons as different plants. The genome doesn’t control the exact connections of neurons any more than plant genomes control the exact positions of each leaf. Rather, there is a general pattern which is repeated by lots of neurons. (Also, in embryos, you can transfer sections of the brain to other sections. The neurons adapt to their new locations just fine – and the brain works fine. This shows that there some sort of general mechanism neurons are using – each neuron is not custom-tailored.)

    The genome controls the growth of the body by controlling the number of cell duplications in gestation. Lengthening or shortening a limb doesn’t mean the genome adds or removes “add a cell. add a cell. add a cell”. Rather, it changes the number of cell duplications that happen.

    So, to increase the number of brain cells – that doesn’t mean the genome needs additional “add a neuron. add a neuron. add a neuron.” instructions. Rather, it says, “keep growing the brain for a longer period of time”, or “grow faster” – so that you end up with a larger number of cell duplications. The brain has an inherent structure to it, but the genome doesn’t need to micromanage brain development like S Keita seems to think it does.

  10. s keita says:

    Where did I say anything about a “Creator” OR TRYING TO PROVE ANYTHING? i just asked how long it took out of simple curiosity and the failure to find any reasonable account of the brain’s evolution. In 20+ textbooks.
    It’s as reasonable as saying there are 300 million Americans, that evolved since 1620, how many a year? (300/388). A harmless question.

    Another unanswerable question later. Eventually you’ll have to ban me. You Angry Americans. Poor Iraq.

  11. Matt says:

    Every question has a purpose and since this blog, and the entries you’ve posed the question, have nothing to do with neural development … well, it makes it pretty clear the asking of the question was done not to get a literal answer.

    I’ve never banned anyone from this blog and don’t intend to any time soon. I hold the philosophy that the daft are their own worst enemy and it is far more beneficial for everyone to witness them shooting themselves in the proverbial foot.

  12. S Keita says:

    You misunderstand the internet, guv. “Everyone” doesn’t witness “everything”. Not even your evasions.

    Sadly, I now believe that some, most or all evolutionists are unable to explain the brain’s evolution.

    “I can’t believe all those professors are unable to explain brain evolution. There must be some mistake.”

  13. AV says:

    S Keita just won teh internets. U R Teh Suxx0rs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  14. “It’s as reasonable as saying there are 300 million Americans, that evolved since 1620, how many a year?”

    Actually, Americans didn’t all evolve from 1620. There were already Americans when America was discovered. Many more Americans are immigrants, which means they adapted there and did not evolve there. The question is loaded. It is not a simple question at all.

    “There are 750 trillion connections in the brain. The 1st brain emerged 600 mya.”
    Similarly, this presupposes that all kinds of brains are generic with x amount of connections. Brains, like other organs, are grown. They are not inserted in a factory, as your question implies.

    It further supposes that there were no predecessor to brains before 600 mya.

    I presume that you are talking about a human brain? I’m not sure. Humans are primates. Primates are thought to have evolved 63 mya. Not 600. That’s primates, the order of which not all members have the same size brain. Humans evolved a little later, at approximately 200 000 years ago. Human brains are larger than monkey brains, although you would not say that considering how some people drive or how some claim divine intervention when they can’t outside the box.

    Point being, these are not simple questions and they are not intelligent questions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s